Foundations
Accountability and the five types of responsibility
Accountability is a records function; responsibility is a person's obligation for property. Knowing which type of responsibility you hold tells you what you can be held liable for.
Almost every supply argument comes down to two words people use interchangeably and should not. Accountability lives on the books. Responsibility lives on a person. A property book officer is accountable for an item that a team leader is directly responsible for, and both of those facts are true at the same time.
- Accountability
- The obligation to keep accurate records of property: what the unit has, where it is, and what condition it is in. It is discharged by the property book officer through the property book and supporting documents.
- Responsibility
- A person's obligation for the proper custody, care, and safekeeping of property. It attaches to individuals, not to records, and it is the hinge on which financial liability turns.
| Type | Who holds it | What it means in practice |
|---|---|---|
| Command | Any commander | Comes with the position and cannot be delegated away. The commander answers for all property in the command whether or not they ever touched it. |
| Supervisory | Any leader over subordinates who use property | The obligation to ensure subordinates use, secure, and maintain property properly. A squad leader carries this for the equipment their Soldiers sign for. |
| Direct | Whoever signed the hand receipt | The obligation for property in your possession and on your hand receipt. This is the most common basis for liability. |
| Custodial | Supply sergeants, warehouse and storage personnel | Held for property in storage awaiting issue, turn-in, or shipment while it sits under your control but is not issued to you for use. |
| Personal | Every Soldier | The obligation for property in your physical possession, whether or not you signed for it. It applies the moment the item is in your hands. |
Responsibility alone does not create a debt. A financial liability investigation still has to show that the responsible person was negligent or engaged in willful misconduct and that the conduct caused the loss. Responsibility only establishes that the person had a duty in the first place.